Atmosphere: How will we work and be together?

What is Atmosphere?

The social environment in which students learn, including relationships between faculty and students and among students themselves, significantly impacts learning and motivation. Creating an inclusive climate fosters a sense of belonging and connection to the course, discipline, and a community of learners, making students feel valued and supported. An inclusive climate welcomes students of all identities and backgrounds by validating their assets and helping them connect prior knowledge and skills to new learning (George Washington University, “Inclusive Pedagogy Toolkit: Climate” webpage).

Atmosphere is the combination of social environment and learning culture in which students learn. Also called climate, this aspect of course design asks us to observe, seek to understand, and reflect on the overall feel of social, cultural, learning, and physical interactions learners experience in our courses, and in their other courses and campus social interactions. Atmosphere can be described using the metaphor of temperature, where a warm climate is welcoming, and a chilly climate feels unwelcoming. 

We can also gauge Atmosphere through undergraduate, professional, and graduate student responses to "sense of belonging" queries in engagement surveys in which students identify the importance of feeling comfortable, safe, welcomed, respected, connected, and mattering to peers, instructors, staff and administrators. Vaccaro and Newman (2016) highlight the importance of positive social classroom relationships to students' day-to-day social and learning experiences. 

For minoritized students (those who self-identify with any minoritized identity, not exclusively BIPOC) their experiences of climate can differ significantly from those of white students. For example, minoritized students emphasize safety and respect as crucial elements of belonging, reflecting their inconsistent experiences with these factors. In contrast,  students without minoritized identities describe a positive sense of belonging as feeling comfortable and fitting in. Therefore, it is essential for instructors to notice who finds the climate welcoming or unwelcoming, and under what circumstances, as a foundation for course design.

Reflect on Atmosphere

Atmosphere’s core question -"How will we work and be together?" - is a springboard for our initial course design thinking about how to create cognitive and affective learning interactions to support a broad range of students working on their own or with teachers and peers to learn new concepts, build knowledge, and create original work. A two-eyed reflective process begins with considering where students are - as learners generally and in relation to the focus of your course,  might be guided by the following questions: 

  • Who are my students and what have been their experiences? 
  • Where are they in their learning processes and where do I want them to be as learners during, after, and beyond this course? 
  • What learning skills and needs do they bring to the course, and can share these skills with peers?
  • What roles as well as responsibilities will they need to enact to become authentic learners in this course or practitioners in our fields of study and what are the multiple skills of participation our students might enact?
  • How will we become mindful of how, when, and when our communication choices, both verbal and non-verbal, can create – or dismantle - supportive and effective learning climates that accommodate the diverse needs and backgrounds of all students, and how might we learn about this from our students?

In reflecting on Atmosphere, we make also make room for two-eyed reflection on we-who-teach:

  • Who we have been as learners, and how have we observed our own peers as learners?
  • How has teaching been modeled for us, and how might we expand our practices in becoming the sorts of teachers that our disciplines and students need now?
  • What have we been taught to believe about how people do or don’t learn, and how might we draw on “Leveraging the Learning Sciences” webpage resources to support learners in navigating the difficulties and excitements they’ll encounter as novice to our fields or to new levels of work in a major program? 
  • How will we use our words and tone, facial expressions and visual resources to be transparent about the roles and responsibilities of teachers and of learners in our learning spaces?

Develop Atmosphere Practices

The first subsection that follows will include resources rich in examples that address the what, how, and why of practices that communicate with students that they, and their learning, matter. A second section will serve as a springboard for reflecting on the “Ideal Impact” we hope our courses will have on learners.

Expand all

On atmosphere-related practices

For examples that address the what, how, and why of practices that matter, please consult the following 3 resources: 

  • Georgetown University’s “Inclusive Pedagogy Toolkit: Climate” webpage sets out several practices addressing how to take an asset-based approach to developing an inclusive classroom Atmosphere with strategy suggestions about building student-student rapport, getting to know students as individuals, and gathering feedback throughout the term.
  • “Supporting Belonging in the Classroom, a pdf created by the UIowa Center for Teaching suggests strategies to support belonging throughout course design, in large and small courses, and with regard to student questions such as: (How) Do I fit with my peers? (How) Do I matter in this classroom? (How) Do I belong in this field of study? (How) Are my questions welcome?
  • Mary Armstrong’s "Small World: Crafting an Inclusive Classroom (No Matter What You Teach)" article sets out supports for her contention that “every single classroom - from Soil Science to Ethnic Studies - can function as an incubator for inclusivity.”
  • The “Suggested Practices for a More Inclusive Class Climate” section of CEI’s Inclusive Teaching webpage features proactive, in-the-moment, and ongoing practice suggestions, as well as noting practices to avoid.   

On ideal impact

  • “What do I want students to have retained from this course in 20 years?” The Ideal Impact question is a big picture query asking us to reflect on what we want our students to be skilled to do because of what they have learned, practiced, and developed in our courses. A short orienting YouTube video (~7 minutes), along with a deeper set of springboard questions noted below, can support you in revisiting or developing a course.
  • The “Ideal Impact: A Reflective Springboard for Course and Syllabus Design” google document lists the Orienting Question along with several Next Stage and Bigger Stage to consider Atmosphere and Impacts beyond your course and classroom.

On Minnesota Nice

Defining

  • Samuel Myers. Outlines "the Minnesota Paradox" in a news article , and podcast.
  • The extended video interview (~25minutes) with authors of “Minnesota Nice - A Transplant's Guide to Surviving and Thriving in Minnesota” includes segments focused on definitions and characteristics, impact on change and protest, and ideas for building friendships and networks.  

Reflecting

  • NPR host and Minnesotan Michele Norris talks with The Current host Jill Riley "On the momentum behind the fight for racial equity.” A transcript google document links to the podcast.
  • Sections from Sparked: George Floyd, Racism, and the Progressive Illusion, published by the Minnesota Historical Society Press, is available through many library systems as a Project MUSE online book. That permalink may require a further login. Two essays by former UMTC instructors are available as blogposts:
    • Walt Jacobs, “Blackasotan Identity Lanes,” reflective essay,
    • Rachel Raimist, “My Beautiful, Broken Minnesota,” reflective essay, 
    • Healing Minnesota Stories report on a "What to consider when acknowledging you are on stolen indigenous lands“ panel discussion.

Syllabus Activity #1: Draft a Reflective Course Memo:

The “Syllabus Activity 1” webpage sets out three components for a first (re)conceptualizing of a course you are creating or revisiting: Context, Description, and Emerging Learning Aims. 

Whether you are creating or revising a syllabus, writing a Reflective Course Memo can work like a palate cleanser as part of a complex dining experience: Rather like a serving of food or drink to clear the tongue allowing to more accurately explore a new flavor, the drafting of a memo works to move the previous syllabus aside to more openly create a new approach to writing a learning-centered syllabus for the students who will be our main audience for the roles and responsibilities, engagement and learning we set out. 

Deeper Dive Resources

Perhaps you’ve already drafted a learning-centered syllabus and wish to carry on with a revision to develop the access and inclusion aspects of your syllabus, or to begin incorporating Generative AI policies and practices into your course in ways that further set a tone for “How will we work together?” We offer the following experiences to support teachers in exploring these components as part of reflecting on Atmosphere as a further section of the Course Memo.

Expand all

Teaching with accessibility and inclusion

  • The UDL OnCampus “Getting Started” webpage addresses accessibility as a Universal Design for Learning practice that teachers can proactively adopt in planning courses; this landing page includes suggestions and processes for getting started, as well as ideas for thinking about using technology and creating course materials.
  • “The Teaching with Access and Inclusion” (TAI) google document acknowledges that “Developing an accessible and inclusive teaching practice may seem like a monumental undertaking, but small steps and changes can make a big difference,” and offers ideas organized around 7 principles with specific course-related suggestions to get you started. 
  • The google document focusing on “Access, Inclusion, and Accommodation in Lab Settings” links the grounding principles of TAI to teaching and learning in lab settings. 

Generative AI - Reflecting on how and why it fits (or doesn’t fit) your course

  • “The Case for Slow-Walking Our Use of Generative AI,” by James Lang for The Chronicle of Higher Education is available online as a webpage (requires login), and as a google document.
  • Leon Furze’s “The AI Assessment Scale: Version 2” blogpost offers “starter friendly” set of Generative AI policy/practice options: No AI, AI-Assisted Idea Generation and Structuring, AI-Assisted Editing, AI Task Completion with Human Evaluation, and Full AI.